Refine your search
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Satisha, J.
- Effect of Canopy Management Practices during forward Pruning on Berry Development and Photosynthesis in Tas-A-Ganesh Grapes
Abstract Views :218 |
PDF Views:107
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune - 412307, IN
1 National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune - 412307, IN
Source
Journal of Horticultural Sciences, Vol 9, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 18-22Abstract
Effect of canopy manipulation during forward pruning on berry development and photosynthetic parameters was studied in Tas-A-Ganesh grape grafted onto Dogridge ischolar_mainstock. Canopy manipulation including shoot thinning, leaf removal, shoot thinning with leaf removal, and shoot pinching, was done after forward pruning. Significant differences were observed in yield and quality. Shoot thinning to about 40 shoots per vine, with removal of three basal leaves, resulted in significantly higher yield, followed by that in shoot thinning alone. Lowest yield was recorded in the Control. Leaf removal drastically reduced bunch development affecting berry weight, diameter and length compared to other treatments. Among different canopy manipulation treatments, higher average bunch weight was recorded in shoot thinning plus leaf removal, whereas, lowest bunch weight was recorded with leaf removal alone. At harvest, the amount of total soluble solids in berries was low in leaf removal at pre-bloom stage, but increased in the treatment of shoot thinning with leaf removal, at the same stage. Different canopy manipulation treatments had significant impact on photosynthesis and transpiration rates. Overall results indicated that canopy manipulation practices such as shoot thinning, to retain 40 shoots per vine with or without leaf removal, followed by pinching, can be recommended to grape growers.Keywords
Grape, Canopy Managements Practices, Photosynthesis, Quality, Yield.- Berry Weight, Quality and Cane Biochemistry Changes in Relation to Cane Thickness of Own-Rooted and Grafted 'Tas-A-Ganesh' Grape
Abstract Views :198 |
PDF Views:117
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Research Centre for Grapes, P.O. Box 03, Manjri Farm Post, Pune - 412 307, IN
1 National Research Centre for Grapes, P.O. Box 03, Manjri Farm Post, Pune - 412 307, IN
Source
Journal of Horticultural Sciences, Vol 8, No 1 (2013), Pagination: 30-34Abstract
A field trial was conducted to determine the effect of cane thickness on berry quality and other biochemical parameters in 'Tas-A-Ganesh' grape at National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune, during the year 2008- 2009. Average bunch weight increased with increase in cane diameter. Own-ischolar_mained vines of cane thickness <6mm sprouted earlier than thicker canes. TSS of berries decreased with increase in berry size. Berries on grafted vines recorded lower TSS than on own-ischolar_mained vines. Biochemical parameters such as content of reducing sugars, carbohydrat and phenols were higher in grafted vines of cane thickness >10mm. Results indicate that thicker canes either on their own ischolar_mains or on grafted vines are superior for yield and yield components, as also for physical properties of bunches and berries and total carbohydrate content of the canes.Keywords
Tas-A-Ganesh, Sprouting, Cane Thickness, Bunch Weight, Total Soluble Solids, Reducing Sugars, Carbohydrates.- Effect of Soil Moisture Stress on Physiological Response in Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Varieties
Abstract Views :217 |
PDF Views:132
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Research Centre for Grapes, P.B. # 3, Manjari Farm, Solapur Road Pune – 412 307, IN
2 Division of Fruit Crops, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore - 560 089, IN
3 Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore - 560 089, IN
1 National Research Centre for Grapes, P.B. # 3, Manjari Farm, Solapur Road Pune – 412 307, IN
2 Division of Fruit Crops, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore - 560 089, IN
3 Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore - 560 089, IN
Source
Journal of Horticultural Sciences, Vol 1, No 2 (2006), Pagination: 99-103Abstract
Four varieties of grape namely Flame Seedless, Thompson Seedless, Sharad Seedless and Tas-A-Ganesh were subjected to different levels of moisture stress to study their physiological response. Stress was imposed for 14 days by withholding irrigation. Observations on relative water content, leaf water potential, leaf osmotic potential and gas exchange parameters like photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and water use efficiency (WUE) were recorded. None of the varieties could survive for 14 days without irrigation (100% stress). Flame Seedless and Thompson Seedless at 50% moisture stress maintained higher turgidity as indicated by lesser reduction in relative water content and water potential attributed to better osmotic adjustment. Marginal reduction in photosynthesis and greater reduction in transpiration rate in the variety Flame Seedless may have resulted in higher WUE under moisture stress. Higher photosynthetic rate, lower transpiration rate, higher water relation parameters and high WUE in Flame Seedless under soil moisture stress indicated its better tolerance to drought.Keywords
Grape Varieties, Soil Moisture Stress, Water Potential, Water Use Efficiency.- Response of Grape Rootstocks to Soil Moisture Stress
Abstract Views :251 |
PDF Views:136
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Research Centre for Grapes, P.B. # 3, Manjari Farm, Solapur Road, Pune-412 307, IN
2 Division of Fruit Crops, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore-560 089, IN
3 Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore-560 089, IN
1 National Research Centre for Grapes, P.B. # 3, Manjari Farm, Solapur Road, Pune-412 307, IN
2 Division of Fruit Crops, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore-560 089, IN
3 Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore-560 089, IN
Source
Journal of Horticultural Sciences, Vol 1, No 1 (2006), Pagination: 19-23Abstract
Studies on ischolar_main and shoot morphology, endogenous hormones and water use efficiency in five grape ischolar_mainstocks namely Dogridge, 1613 C, Salt Creek, St. George and Vitis champinii clone (VC Clone) at three levels of moisture stress viz., no stress (100% irrigation), 50% stress (50% irrigation) and 100% stress (without irrigation) for 14 days revealed that Dogridge and Salt Creek ischolar_mainstocks maintained the highest ratios of ischolar_main to shoot length and ischolar_main to shoot dry weight as compared to other ischolar_mainstocks. Water use efficiency increased with increased soil moisture stress and was the highest in Dogridge and Salt Creek. The abscisic acid content in the leaves of Dogridge was maximum at 50% stress followed by that of Salt Creek. Similarly the cytokinin content (both t-ZR and DHZR) was minimum in Dogridge and Salt Creek at 50% stress while it was maximum in 1613 C and St.George. The ischolar_main to shoot length ratio was positively correlated with ABA content under moisture stress conditions. The higher levels of abscisic acid content in Dogridge and Salt Creek under soil moisture stress suggested their better drought tolerance capacity through a reduction of stomatal conductance and increased water use efficiency.Keywords
ABA, Cytokinins, Grape Rootstocks, Root to Shoot Length Ratio, Root to Shoot Dry Weight Ratio, Water Use Efficiency.- Influence of Different Sources and Methods of Potassium Application on the Quality of Grapes Cv. Sharad Seedless (Vitis vinifera L.)
Abstract Views :229 |
PDF Views:84
Authors
Y. Pushpavathi
1,
J. Satisha
1,
G. C. Satisha
1,
K. S. Shivashankara
1,
M. Lakshminarayana Reddy
2,
S. Sriram
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta, Bengaluru 560 089, IN
2 Dr Y.S.R. Horticultural University, Venkataramannagudem 534 101, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta, Bengaluru 560 089, IN
2 Dr Y.S.R. Horticultural University, Venkataramannagudem 534 101, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 118, No 4 (2020), Pagination: 639-643Abstract
Potassium is often considered as the quality element for crop production. Grapevine is one of the most potassium-friendly plants that has a better ability to utilize soil potassium. Grape berries are a strong sink for potassium, particularly during ripening. To ascertain the influence of the combined application of different sources and methods of potassium application on the quality of grape cv. Sharad Seedless, an experiment was conducted at Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru during two consecutive years, viz. 2016–17 and 2017–18 with three different sources of potassium fertilizers (SOP, KNO3 and 19 : 19 : 19), and two methods of application (soil application and fertigation). Pooled analysis revealed that among the treatments, grapevines treated with sulphate of potash as 60% through fertigation and 40% through soil registered the highest total soluble solids (22.16° ºBrix), Brix : acid (36.38), total sugars (19.66%) and least titratable acidity (0.61%) in berries. With regards to biochemical constituents like total phenols, total flavonoids and anthocyanins, significantly highest value was observed in vines treated with 100% SOP through fertigation.Keywords
Fertigation, Grape, Potassium, Source and Method, Soil Application.References
- Ruel, J. J. and Walker, M. A., Resistance to Pierce’s disease in Muscadinia rotundifolia and other native grape species. Am. J. Enol. Viticult., 2006, 57(2), 158–165.
- Jackson, D. I. and Lombard, P. B., Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality – a review. Am. J. Enol. Viticult., 1993, 44(4), 409–430.
- Bravdo, B. A. and Hepner, Y., Irrigation management and fertigation to optimize grape composition and vine performance. Acta Hortic., 1987, 206, 49–67.
- Jackson, R. S., Wine Science: Principles, Practice, Perception, Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, 2000, 2nd edn.
- Satisha, J., Somkuwar, R. G., Sharma, J., Upadhyay, A. K. and Adsule, P. G., Influence of ischolar_mainstocks on growth yield and fruit composition of Thompson seedless grapes grown in the Pune region of India. S. Afr. J. Eno. Vit., 2010, 31(1), 1–8.
- AOAC, Official method 942.15 Acidity (Titrable) of fruit products read with A.O.A.C official method 920. 149 Preparation of test sample. 2000, 17th edn.
- Somogyi, M., Notes on sugar determination. J. Biol. Chem., 1952, 195, 19–23.
- Singleton, V. L. and Rossi, J. A., A colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic–phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Viticult., 1965, 16, 144–158.
- Chun, O. K., Kim, D. O., Moon, H. Y., Kang, H. G. and Lee, C. Y., Contribution of individual polyphenolics to total antioxidant capacity of plums. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2003, 51, 7240–7245.
- Fuleki, T., The anthocyanins of strawberry, rubber and onion. J. Food Sci., 1969, 34, 365–369.
- Epstein, E. and Bloom, A. J., Inorganic components of plants. In Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Massachusetts, USA, 2005, 2nd edn, pp. 44–45.
- Mengel, K. and Kirkby, E. A., Principles of Plant Nutrition, Bulletin of International Potash Institute, Bern, 1987, pp. 436– 437.
- Al-Moshileh, A. and Al-Rayes, D., Effect of potassium fertilization regimes on petiole nutrient contents, yield and fruit quality of table Seedless Grapes. In IPI Regional Workshop on Potassium and Fertigation Development in West Asia and North Africa. Rabat, Morocco, 2004, pp. 24–28.
- El-Nasharty, A. B., El-Nwehy, S. S., Rezk, A. I. and El-Masri, M. F., Potassium–magnesium petiole contents in relation to grapevine yield and its quality. Int. J. PharmTech. Res., 2016, 12(9), 397– 404.
- Samra, N. R., El-Kady, M. I., Hassan, A. H. and Pomology, O. M., Studies on potassium fertilization and summer pruning on Thompson seedless grapes. J. Agric. Sci., 2007, 32(3), 2149–2159.
- Dhillon, W. S., Bindra, A. S. and Brar, B. S., Response of grapes to potassium fertilization in relation to fruit yield, quality and petiole nutrient status. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 1999, 47(1), 89–94.
- Lambert, J. J. and Wolpert, J. A., Soil potassium availability and management in relation to major soil types in Napa and Sonoma. In ASEV 57th Annual Meeting, USA, 2006.
- Rashid, A., Kirmani, N. A., Nazir, N. and Shafi, S., Quality of apple CV Red Delicious as influenced by potassium. Asian J. Soil Sci., 2008, 3, 227–229.
- Singh, H. and Singh, R., Effect of organic manure and GA3 on yield and quality of strawberry. Punjab Hortil. J., 1979, 19, 71– 73.
- Li, W., He, P. and Jin, J., Potassium influenced phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, peroxidases and polyphenol oxidases in Fusarium graminearum infected maize (Zea mays L.). 2009; https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3cf201nb
- Delgado, R. P., Martin, M., Alamo, D. and Gonzalez, M., Changes in phenolic composition of grape berries during ripening in relation to vineyard nitrogen and potassium fertilization rates. J. Sci. Food Agric., 2004, 84, 623–630.
- Zangeneh, N. and Rasouli, M., Effect of potassium fertilizers and humic acid on the pigments and activity of antioxidants in grape ‘Bidaneh Sefid’. Iran. J. Hortic. Sci., 2017, 48(3), 701–714.
- Effect of Leaf Removal on Composition of Wine Grape Varieties Grown in Semiarid Tropical Climate of India
Abstract Views :217 |
PDF Views:110
Authors
J. Satisha
1,
R. G. Somkuwar
2
Affiliations
1 Division of Fruit Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru - 560 089, IN
2 ICAR - National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune - 412 307, IN
1 Division of Fruit Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru - 560 089, IN
2 ICAR - National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune - 412 307, IN
Source
Journal of Horticultural Sciences, Vol 14, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 115-124Abstract
Removing leaves from cluster zone is one of the management practices followed to improve fruit composition in temperate wine grape growing countries. However, knowledge on canopy management practices to improve fruit and juice composition for quality wine making is still lacking in semiarid tropical regions of India. Due to ample sunlight availability during fruit growth in semiarid tropics, it is unclear whether the leaves have to be removed from cluster zone. In case the leaves have to be removed, the direction from which it has to be done is also important. Hence, this study was conducted to see the effect of leaf removal from two sides of canopy on fruit composition in two wine grape varieties. In Cabernet Sauvignon vines leaf removal from both east and west side of the canopyimproved fruit quality in terms of reduced pH, potassium, malic acid and increased phenolics. Nevertheless, removing leaves from eastern side was found to be better than western side, because clusters are exposed toexcess sunlight. However, in Sauvignon Blanc, leaf removal from east side improved most of the desirable fruit composition parameters, while leaf removal from west side reduced the fruit quality in terms of sugars, acids, pH, total phenols etc.Keywords
Cabernet Sauvignon, Sauvignon Blanc, Fruit Composition, Leaf Removal, Organic Acids, Phenolic Compounds.References
- Bergqvist, J., Dokoozlian, N and Ebisuda,N. 2001.Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the central San Joaquin valley of California. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 52:1–7.
- Boulton, R., 1980. The general relationship between potassium, sodium and pH in grape juice and wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 31(2), pp.182-186
- Cortell, J.M. and Kennedy, J.A. 2006. Effect of shading on accumulation of flavonoid compounds in (Vitis vinifera L.) Pinot Noir fruit and extraction in a model system. J. Agri. Food Chem.54: 8510–8520.
- Dokoozlian, N. K. and Kliewer, W.M. 1996. Influence of light on grape berry growth and composition varies during fruit development. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.121:869–874.
- Downey, M.O., Dokoozlian, N.K. and Krstic,M.P. 2006. Cultural practice and environmental impacts on the flavonoid composition of grapes and wine: A review of recent research. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 57: 257–268.
- Ferree, D.C., Scurlock,D.M. Steiner,T. and Gallander, J. 2004. ‘Chambourcin’ grapevine response to crop level and canopy shade at bloom. J. Amer. Pomology Soc.58:35-141.
- Gladstones, J. 1992. Viticulture and Environment, Wine titles, Adelaide, South Australia. 310p.
- Haselgrove, L., Botting,D., Van Heeswijck,R., Hoi,P.B., Dry, P.R., Ford,C. and Iland,P.G. 2000. Canopy microclimate and berry composition: the effect of bunch exposure on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz grape berries. Aust. J.Grape and Wine Res.6:141-149.
- Jeong, S.T., Goto-Yamamoto, N. Kobayashi, S. and Esaka. M. 2004. Effects of plant hormones and shading on the accumulation of anthocyanins and the expr ession of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in grape berry skins. Plant Sci.167: 247–252.
- Kemp, B.S., Harrison,R. and Creasy,G.L. 2011. Effect of leaf removal and its timing on flavan-3 –ols composition and concentration in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot Noir wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.17: 270-279.
- Kliewer, W.M. and Smart,R.E.1989.Canopy manipula tion for optimizing vine microclimate, crop yield and composition of grapes. In: C.J. Wright (Ed.), Manipulation of Fruiting. Butterworth, London, pp. 275291.
- Kodur, S., Tisdall,J.M., Tang, C. and Walker, R.R. 2010. Accumulation of pot assium in grapevine ischolar_mainstocks (Vitis) grafted to Shiraz as affected by growth, ischolar_main-traits and transpiration. Vitis.49: 7-13.
- Kodur, S. 2011. Effects of juice pH and potassium on juice and wine quality, and regulation of potassium in grapevines through ischolar_mainstocks (Vitis): a short review. Vitis.50:1–6.
- Lakso, A.N., and Kliewer,W.M. 1978. The influence of temperature on malic acid metabolism in grape berries. II. Temperature responses of net dark CO2 fixation and malic acid pools. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic.29:145-149.
- Lang, A., and Thorpe,M.R. 1989. Xylem, phloem and transpiration flows in a grape: application of a technique for measuring the volume of attached fruits to high resolution using Archimedes principle. J. Expt. Bot.40: 1069-1078.
- Main, G.L. and Morris, J.R. 2004. Leaf-removal effects on Cynthiana yield, juice composition, and wine composition. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 55:147-152.
- Mikes, O., Crchotova,N., Triska,J., Kyselakova,M., and Smidrkar, K. 2008. Distribution of major polyphenolic compounds in wine grapes of different cultivars grown in South Moravian vineyards. Czech J.Food Sci.26: 182-189.
- Morrison, J.C. and Noble,A.C. 1990. Effects of Leaf and ClusterShading on the Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon Grapes and on Fruit and Wine Sensory Properties. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 41: 193-200.
- Poni, S., Casalini,L., Bernizzoni,F., Civardi, S. and Intrieri,C. 2006. Effects of early defoliation on shoot photosynthesis, yield components, and grape composition. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 57: 397–407.
- Reynolds, A.G.R., Pool, M. and Mattick, L.R. 1986. Influence of cluster exposure on the fruit composition and wine quality of Seyval Blanc grapes. Vitis.25: 85–95.
- Ristic, R., Downey, P., Iland, K., Bindon, L., Francis, M., Hederich, and Robinson,S. 2007. Exclusion of sunlight from Shiraz grapes alters wine colour, tannins and sensory properties. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.13:53–65.
- Ristic, R., Pinchbeck,K.A., Fudge,A.L., Hayaska, Y. and Wilkinson,K.L. 2013. Effect of leaf removal and grapevine smoke exposure on colour, chemical composition and sensory properties of Chardonnay wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.19: 230-237.
- Smart, R.E., 1985. Principles of grapevine canopy microclimate manipulation with implications for yield and quality- A review. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic.35:230-239.
- Smart, R.E., Smith, S.M. and Winchester R.V.1988. Light quality and quality effects on fruit ripening for Cabernet Sauvignon. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 39: 250–258.
- Tardaguila, J., Diago,M.P., Martinez de Toda,F., Poni,S. and Vilanova, M. 2008. Effects of timing of leaf removal on yield, berry maturity,wine composition and sensory properties of cv. Grenache grown under non irrigated conditions. J. Intl. Sci. Vine Wine. 42: 221-229.
- Vasconcelos, M.C. and Castagnoli, S. 2000. Leaf canopy structure and vine performance. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 51:390-396.
- Waterhouse, A.L. and Lamuela-Raventos, R. 1994. The occurrence of piceid, a stilbene glucoside in grape berries. Phytochem.37:571–573.
- Vegetative Propagation of Papaya (Carica papaya L.) Through Grafting
Abstract Views :101 |
PDF Views:60
Authors
J. Satisha
1,
Linta Vincent
1
Affiliations
1 Division of Fruit Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Benglauru 560 089, India., IN
1 Division of Fruit Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Benglauru 560 089, India., IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 2 (2023), Pagination: 239-244Abstract
In papaya orchards raised through seedlings, large variation in sex forms is a major hindrance to its cultivation on a commercial scale. Similarly, in papaya breeding, if a desirable trait is to be fixed in future generations, it is essential to multiply the plants by asexual means for evaluation on a large scale as sexual propagation has several drawbacks. Limited studies have been conducted on vegetative propagation in papaya under the tropical climate of India. Hence, the present study was initiated to standardize vegetative propagation through grafting under separate experiments. A combination of growth hormones and different aged seedlings was used to induce lateral shoots on the mother plants to utilize them as scions for grafting. Spraying BA @ 100 ppm + GA3 @ 250 ppm on 5–6 month-old mother plants could produce more graftable size shoots. Among different methods, softwood wedge grafting recorded maximum success followed by cleft grafting. Field evaluation of grafted and seedling plants revealed that the former were dwarfs and sturdy, induced early flowering at a lower heights and came to harvest earlier than the seedlings. Though physical fruit parameters showed a significant difference between grafted and seedling plants, no difference was recorded for fruit quality parameters.Keywords
Cytokinins, Grafting, Lateral Shoots, Papaya, Vegetative Propagation.References
- Allan, P. and McMillan, C. N., Advances in propagation of Carica papaya L. cv. Honey Gold cuttings. J. South African Hortic. Sci., 1991, 1, 69–72.
- Villegas, V. N., The biology of Carica papaya L. In Plant Re-sources of South East Asia, 2: Edible Fruits and Nuts (eds Verheji, E. W. M. and Colonel, R. E.), PROSEA Foundation, Bogor Indonesia, 1997, p. 17.
- Sao José, A. R. and e-Marin, S. L. D., Propagação do mamoeiro. In Mamão (ed. Ruggiero, C.), FUNEP, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil, 1988, pp. 177–196.
- Allan, P. and Carison, C., Progress and problems in rooting clonal Carica papaya cuttings. 2007. South African J. Plant Soil, 2009, 24, 22–25; doi:10.1080/02571862.2007.10634776.
- Chong, S. T. et al., In First International Symposium on Papaya, Genting Highlands, Malaysia, 2005, pp. 22–24.
- Allan, P., Propogation of ‘Honey Gold’ papayas by cuttings. Acta Hortic., 1995, 370, 99–102; doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.370.15.
- Chong, S. T., Prabhakaran, R. and Lee, H. K., An improved tech-nique of propagating ‘Eksotika’ papaya. Acta Hortic., 2008, 787, 273–276.
- Teixeira, J. A. et al., Papaya (Carica papaya L.) biology and bio-technology. Tree For. Sci. Biotechnol., 2009, 1(1), 47–73.
- Nguyen, V. H. and Yen, C. R., Rootstock age and grafting season affect graft success and plant growth of papaya (Carica papaya L.) in greenhouse. Chil. J. Agric. Res., 2018, 78, 59–67.
- Hartmann, H. T., Kester, D. E., Davies, F. T. and Geneve, R. L., Hartmann and Kester’s Plant Propagation: principles and Practic-es, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 2002, 8th edn, p. 869.
- Ahmad, N. and Anis, M., Rapid plant regeneration protocol for cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.Taub.). J. Hortic. Sci. Bio-technol., 2007, 84, 585–589.
- Teixeira Da Silva, J. A., In vitro response of papaya (Carica papaya L.) to plant growth regulators. Nusantara Biosci., 2016, 8, 77–82.
- Anandan, R., Sudhakar, D., Balasubramanianan, O. and Gutierrez-Morab, A., In vitro somatic embryogenesis from suspension cultures of Carica papaya L. Sci. Hortic., 2012, 136, 43–49.
- Yie, Shi-Tao and Liaw, L., Plant regeneration from shoot tips and callus of papaya. In vitro, 1977, 13, 564–560.
- Muller, D. and Leyser, O., Auxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching. Ann. Bot., 2011, 107, 1203–1212.
- Tanaka, M., Takei, K., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H. and Mori, H., Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance. Plant J., 2006, 45, 1028–1036.
- Jiménez, V. M., Mora-Newcomer, E. and Gutiérrez-Soto, M. V., Biology of the papaya plants. In Genetics and Genomics of Papaya Plant Genetics, and Genomics: Crops and Models (eds Ming, R. and Moore, P.), Springer, New York, 2014, p. 17; https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-1-4614-8087-7-7_2.
- Carneiro, C. E. and Cruz, J. L., Caracterização anatômica de órgãos vegetativos do mamoeiro. Ciênc. Rural, 2009, 39, 918–921.
- Knight, R. J., Origin and world importance of tropical and subtrop-ical fruit crops. In Tropical and Subtropical Fruits: Composition, Properties and Uses (eds Nagy, S. and Shaw, P. E.), AVI Publishing, Westport, USA, 1980, pp. 1–120.
- Nakasone, H. Y. and Lamoureux, C., Transitional forms of herma-phroditic papaya flowers leading to complete maleness. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 1982, 10, 589–592.
- Manica, I., Fruticultura Tropical. 3 – Mamao. Ed. Agronomica Ceres LTDA, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1982.
- Kawaguchi, M., Taji, A., Backhouse, D. and Oda, M., Anatomy and physiology of graft incompatibility in solanaceous plants. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 2008, 83(5), 581–588.
- Hancock, W. G., Grafting male papaw trees. Queensl. Agric. J., 1940, 54, 377–379.
- Airi, S. K., Gill, S. S. and Singh, S. N., Clonal propagation of papaya (Carica papaya L.). J. Agric. Res., 1986, 23, 237–239.
- Alvarez-Hernandez, J. C., Castellanos-Ramos, J. Z. and Aguirre-Mancilla, C. L., Adaptation of a grafting method for Carica papaya based on seedling behavior. HortScience, 2019, 54(6), 982–987.
- Singh, N. P. and Srivastava, R. P., A new approach towards double grafting in mango. Curr. Sci., 1980, 49(17), 678–679.
- Malik, M. N., Horticulture, National Book Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan, 1994, p. 439.
- Agbo, C. U. and Omaliko, C. M., Initiation and growth of shoots of Gongronema latifolia Benth stem cuttings in different rooting media. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2006, 5(5), 425–428.
- Hussain, J., Wanni, M. S., Mir, M. A., Rather, Z. and Bhat, K., Micro-grafting for fruit crop improvement. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2014, 13, 2474–2483.
- Allan, P., Clark, C. and Laing, M., Grafting papayas (Carica papaya L.). Acta Hortic., 2010, 851, 253–258; doi:10.17660/ActaHortic. 2010.851.38.
- Chan, L. K. and Teo, C. K. H., Micropropagation of ‘Eksotika’, a Malaysian papaya cultivar and the field performance of the tissue culture derived clones. Acta Hortic., 2002, 575, 99–105.
- Drew, R. A. and Vogler, J. N., Field evaluation of tissue-cultured papaw clones in Queensland. Austral. J. Exp. Agric., 1993, 33, 475– 479.
- Fitch, M. M. M. et al., Clonally propagated and seed-derived papaya orchards: I plant production and field growth. HortScience, 2005, 40, 1283–1290.
- Chiu, L. H. and Yang, Y. S., Effect of grafting on growth and de-velopment and nutrient absorption of Tainung No. 2 papaya (Carica papaya L.) plants. Bull. Taiching Dist. Agric. Improv. Sec., 2004, 85, 37–46.
- Tubbs, F. R., Research fields in the interaction of rootstocks and scions in woody perennials. Hortic. Abstr., 1973, 43, 325–335.
- Soumelidou, K., Battey, N. H., John, P. and Barnett, J. R., The anatomy of the developing bud union and its relationship to dwarfing in apple. Ann. Bot., 1994, 72(6), 605–611.
- Atkinson, C. J. and Else, M. A., Understanding how rootstocks dwarf fruit trees. Compact Fruit Tree, 2001, 34, 46–49.
- Lima, L. A., Naves, R. V., Yamanishi, O. K. and Pancoti, H. L., Behavior of three papaya genotypes propagated by grafting in Brazil. Acta Hortic., 2010, 851, 343–348.
- Souza, L. D., Dinz, R. P., Neves, R., Alves, A. A. and Olivieria, E. J., Grafting as a strategy to increase flowering in cassava. Sci. Hortic., 2018, 240, 544–551.
- Honore, M. N., Belmonte-Urena, L. J., Navarro-Velasco, A. and Camacho-Ferre, F., The production and quality of different varieties of papaya grown under greenhouse in short cycle in continental Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2019, 16, 1789–1804; doi:10. 3390/ijerph16101789.
- Senthilkumar, S., Kumar, N., Soorianathasundaram, K. and Jeya-Kumar, P., Aspects on asexual propagation in papaya (Carica papaya L.): a review. Agric. Rev., 2014, 35(4), 307–313.
- Lange, A. H., Reciprocal grafting of normal and dwarf Solo papaya on growth and yield. HortScience, 1969, 4, 304–306.
- Jai Prakash, Das, S. P., Bhattacharjee, T. and Singh, N. P., Studies on effect of pollarding in papaya. Indian J. Hortic., 2014, 71, 419–420.